Search for: "U.S. Government" Results 4661 - 4680 of 136,346
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Mara Karlin
What role can Congress play to deepen U.S. engagement and consultation with key coalition members—above all, the Iraqi government? [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 7:01 am by Justin Sherman
In other words, the executive needs to clearly identify the problem the U.S. government is trying to solve. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:36 am by Jonathan Adler
Shalala, 512 U.S. 504 (1994) The post Symposium: Government agencies shouldn’t get to put a thumb on the scales appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:37 pm by Riana Pfefferkorn
If Messenger’s encryption has been weakened at U.S. government behest, users—and the public at large, in the U.S. and globally—deserve to know that. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 7:00 am by EEM
Government shutdown is having on access to information:Catalog of U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2023, 6:31 am
Since we published our last study on U.S. sustainability reports 12 months ago, political attacks on ESG have escalated heading into the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 6:45 am by Simon Lester
 The Secretariat shall be an expert in international trade policy and serve on both inter-agency and inter-government work groups to enhance and streamline the process. [read post]
24 May 2007, 1:50 pm
Similarly, the exemption in § 126.4(c) only applies to exports for end-use by the U.S. government in a foreign country, which was also not the case. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 11:43 am by Kalvis Golde
The government emphasizes that the justices previously declined to review three separate rulings by the U.S. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 7:07 am
The Supreme Court on Monday asked the U.S. [read post]
24 May 2019, 11:33 am by David Greene
And the U.S. government has regularly maintained, in EFF’s own cases and elsewhere, that virtually any release of classified information injures the United States and advantages foreign nations.The DOJ indictment thus raises questions about what specific acts of “encouragement” the department believes cross the bright line between First Amendment protected newsgathering and crime. [read post]