Search for: "United States v. House" Results 4661 - 4680 of 12,012
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am by James Bickford
”  The cert. petitions in that case, United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:13 am
United Cerebral Palsy has compiled a comprehensive Resource Guide for individuals with cerebral palsy in Alaska. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Romney, since the Republican Party currently controls 33 state delegations in the House compared to 15 by the Democrats, with two states evenly divided. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
(See paragraph 28, referring to Royal College of Nursing of the United Kingdom v Department of Health and Social Security [1981] AC 800 (HL)). [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm by Kim Nayyer
Kirtsaeng bought textbooks in Thailand, where they are cheap, brought them to the United States, and resold them at a large profit. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 6:59 am
 The United States filed its opposition on June 5, 2015. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:15 am by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
This requirement is consistent with the limitation imposed upon state-taxpayer standing in federal courts in Doremus v. [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 6:12 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Homeland SecurityThe investigation and arrest of Prokopi is an outgrowth of the civil forfeiture case of United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 10:01 pm by Roy Ginsburg
”) Background Facts Staub, a member of the United States Army Reserve, worked at Proctor Hospital as an angiography technician. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:24 am by Rich Cassidy
Supreme Court: Competence Requires that Defense Counsel Correctly Advise Criminal Defendants of Deportation Risk Due to Conviction,” the United States Supreme Court has recognized in Padilla v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 4:58 am by Andrew Frisch
 The current regulation has previously been upheld by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Long Island Care at Home, LTD. v. [read post]