Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 10,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2015, 9:00 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:46 pm
That lawsuit, Jewel v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 3:08 pm
Rev. 693 (1976) --Poe v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm
Stiftelsen SINTEF (EPLAW) Poland Voivodeship Administrative Court: Design, freedom and Polish law: VI SA / Wa 518/09 (Class 99) Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia looking into setting up special IP courts (IP Factor) South Africa Western Cape High Court finds in favour of Trimega, grants interim interdict preventing Real World Diagnostics from using IP related to drink-driving breathalysers (Afro-IP) (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Civil Law Reform Bill: latest news (PatLit) UK… [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 4:04 pm
" Id.The issue also includes a case note on the United States v. [read post]
6 Aug 2017, 9:01 pm
United States and the similar case of Farha V. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am
By 5-4 decision, the Supreme yesterday put an end to consumer class actions in AT&T v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:44 pm
(IPKat) Next lap in Force India vs Ethiad dispute (IPKat) United States US General US election brings IP uncertainty (IP Watch) US Patent Reform Patent Reform still on the table (Patents Post Grant Blog) US Patents Bond’s gun a hit at the USPTO (IPKat) Regional patent office coming to a city near you? [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 11:32 am
” United Servs. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:01 am
United States and the Long Struggle over Sexual Expression (University Press of Kansas) Ilya Shapiro, editor, Cato Supreme Court Review: 2012-2013 Mark Tushnet, In the Balance: Law and Politics on the Roberts Court (Harvard University Press) Forthcoming books Davison M. [read post]
16 May 2012, 7:04 am
” Id. at 387 (quoting United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:45 pm
United States, 128 S. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:08 am
Thanks to District Court Judge Joan Ericksen of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, next week NeoCon attendees will be able to see and experience both SEEYOND and BEYOND products, without likely confusion, when she confirmed last week in a written order her previous oral denial of the plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order in Verscene Inc. and Seeyond Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:15 am
At Education Week, Mark Walsh reports on the grant in in Janus v. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
In 2018, the United States Supreme Court addressed this issue in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:30 am
Tuttle v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:01 am
“Th[e] ascendance of public-sector unions has been marked by a parallel increase in public spending,” he writes, offering some figures, sourced not to the briefs but to the Statistical Abstract of the United States, showing that state and local government expenditures more than doubled in real terms from 1970 to 2014. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 2:49 am
" United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 2:24 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm
They conduct business in connection with an “E1” design mark, though only two of the five defendants have ever used the mark in the United States. [read post]
