Search for: "United States v. Marks"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 9,517
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
– ‘Rioja’ GI survives (Class 46) Suriname Impersonator acquitted of attempting to deceive paying customers into thinking she is the true Toni Braxton (1709 Copyright Blog) Switzerland Some data on 3D trademarks in Switzerland (Class 46) Shapes that made it, and those that didn’t (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Revocation proceedings not an abuse of process even if not commercially justified: TNS Group Holdings Ltd v Neilsen Media… [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 11:35 am
Historical footnote: I chaired the first ever CPD training session on intellectual property for solicitors, at the Queen Mary College IP Unit, on Day 1. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 3:59 am
Supreme Court justices, not just in the United States but abroad as well. [read post]
31 May 2010, 6:49 am
In Hans v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 4:58 am
His body, which displayed marks of torture and execution, was found on September 1, 2003 approximately 700 km away from Camp Bucca, in an area not controlled by British forces. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 12:00 am
Adam knew this long before United States District Judge James Zagel issued his ruling. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 12:45 pm
Stronghold claims because it promoted and sold the Stronghold version of the game throughout the United States, Stronghold became the common law owner of the Great Western Trail Marks (“GWT Marks”) for board games in the United States. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 6:15 am
United States, 315 U. [read post]
23 Mar 2007, 1:14 am
United States [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 4:55 pm
United States but before Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
Anderson, 539 U.S. 1, 6 (2003) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
20 May 2009, 9:00 pm
" (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).'" U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
De YoungCase number: 14-cv-00309 (United States District Court for the District of Utah)Case filed: April 24, 2014Qualifying Judgment/Order: April 21, 2016 5/31/2016 8/29/2016 2016-73 SEC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 6:23 am
United States, in which the state seeks review of a Ninth Circuit decision blocking the enforcement of key provisions of Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:51 pm
See, The United States Department of Justice Manual §9-105.000. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 5:55 pm
Oct. 18, 2010), Judge Arpert lists a number of cases cited by the Plaintiff, and left in the Bloomberg Law citations: United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Case number: 11-cv-1271 (United States District Court for the District of Columbia) Case filed: July 13, 2011 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 23, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-83 SEC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 9:58 am
“The overriding consideration in this case,” the judge ruled, “is that some of the very same issues Plaintiff presents here are currently pending for decision before the Supreme Court of the United States,” citing the case of Baze v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:07 am
” Mark Walsh has a first-hand view of all three of yesterday’s arguments for this blog. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 11:33 am
The Lanham Act is protective of all trademarks that a proponent can establish having used in the United States, whether registered or not. [read post]
