Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 4661 - 4680 of 9,868
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2016, 8:40 am by Lyle Denniston
United States comes up for one hour of argument. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 4:18 am by Timothy P. Flynn
So it was yesterday at the High Court in Washington, D.C. for argument in the case of United States v Texas, posing an important immigration policy question that tests the very limits of executive branch power.This case presented an evenly divided Court -down one justice following Justice Scalia's sudden death in February- with the task of passing muster on President Obama's innovative immigration policy; a series of recent executive directives made through the… [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:37 pm by Mark Walsh
It’s the last two-week argument session of the Term, and today is the biggest of the last group of cases: United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm by Molly Runkle
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 11:17 am by Lyle Denniston
  That, at least, seemed likely after a ninety-minute argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 4:36 am by Immigration Prof
Adam Liptak writes of the possibility that Chief Justice John Roberts might side with the Obama administration in United State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:50 am by Amy Howe
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in just one case:  United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:02 pm by Jared Beck
(Citizens United itself overruled a 20-year old precedent, Austin v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 11:30 am by Ezra Rosser
 OPINION AND ACTION: WHAT AMERICANS ARE SAYING AND POLITICIANS ARE DOING      ► ECONOMIC INSECURITY IN THE UNITED STATES Karlyn Bowman, Andrew Rugg, and Jennifer K. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:19 am by Betty Lupinacci
” More recently, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts has stated that: “There’s a concern (among justices) about the impact of television on the functioning of the institution. [read post]