Search for: "Williams v. A"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 19,696
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2011, 1:27 pm
The statute did not state that the threat of class action must be set forth, according to the court.Dismissal of the CLRA claims was affirmed in two of the actions on appeal in which the proposed class of ticket purchasers was so broadly defined that material misrepresentations to the whole class could not be shown.The August 22 opinion in Stearns v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 8:08 am
William Baude (Stanford Law School) has posted Beyond DOMA: Choice of State Law in Federal Statutes (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 64, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
Justice Alito’s opinion for the Court in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 6:10 am
In an October 1, 2012, ruling in Shocking Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:54 am
William Patry writes about a recent U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 3:38 pm
William Robert Dailey (Notre Dame Law) has posted Who is the Attorney General's Client? [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:43 am
Johnson’s contention, the suit was not about the consumer's general purchasing habits.The February 18 opinion in Koh v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 12:36 pm
Here is the abstract: The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
In 1982, the Supreme Court held, in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District No. 26 v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 9:44 am
Lanier, William J. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 2:23 pm
Snapple Purchasers’ “All Natural” Claims Meet Fraud Pleading StandardsThis posting was written by William Zale, Editor of CCH Advertising Law Guide.Purchasers of Snapple drink products pleaded with particularity that “all natural” labeling of beverages containing high fructose corn syrup (HFCS) was deceptive and fraudulent under California consumer protection laws, the federal district court in Sacramento has ruled.The purchasers' broader allegations… [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 3:58 am
Williams v. [read post]
2 Nov 2019, 12:11 pm
Hailey Larkin, 115,985 (Jackson)Direct appeal (petition for review); DUIMatthew Ryan Roy Williams[Petition dismissed as improvidently granted; February 5, 2020]Failure to suppress blood test resultsInsufficient evidence of BAC at time of drivingJudicial misconduct (improper judicial comment)December 19--Thursday--a.m.State v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 5:25 pm
William Outhet, No. 112, 010 (Johnson)Direct appeal (petition for review); attempted first-degree premeditated murderMichelle A. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 1:05 pm
Ryan Eddinger won in State v. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
This post was authored by Professor Williams, Professor Eccles, Ms. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
By William W. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:00 pm
By William W. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 10:19 am
No Harm, No Foul: Cravath Allowed to Continue Air Products Work [WSJ Law Blog] Airgas Deflated in Chancery Court Battle with Cravath [Am Law Daily] Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 1:45 pm
Peter Margulies of Roger Williams School of Law has this article on proposed amendments to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). [read post]
