Search for: "York v York"
Results 4661 - 4680
of 52,973
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
., [OPSR] et al. v Renee Campion [NYC] et al. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
., [OPSR] et al. v Renee Campion [NYC] et al. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In D.P. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 3:17 pm
From a decision today by Judge John Sinatra (W.D.N.Y.) in Christian v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:47 am
Schechter Poultry Corp. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 7:12 am
Building off the United States Supreme Court’s decision in TransUnion LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:44 am
As the district court reasoned, applying the New York Court of Appeals precedent in Tiplado v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:03 am
In People v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 6:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
Citing Seifullah v City of New York, 161 AD3d 1206, the Appellate Division said contrary to the Plaintiff's contention, the filing of a notice of claim was a condition precedent to the maintenance of his action and Plaintiff's reliance upon Margerum v City of Buffalo (24 NY3d 721) was misplaced. * See Executive Law §296. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 4:58 am
” The Court in cases like New York Times v. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
By Atreya Mathur Credit: DALL·E 2; text prompts (left to right): painting of a robot holding justice scales; painting of a robot-artist painting flowers; painting of a robot reading a law bookWhat does it take to be an artist in the 21st century? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 2:28 pm
By Atreya Mathur Credit: DALL·E 2; text prompts (left to right): painting of a robot holding justice scales; painting of a robot-artist painting flowers; painting of a robot reading a law bookWhat does it take to be an artist in the 21st century? [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 10:42 am
Proposed Disciplines on IFD Consolidated Text ('Easter Text') Preamble Section I: Scope and General Principles - Scope of application; exclusion of market access, investment protection and ISDS; - Firewall provision (aimed at insulating the Agreement from investment agreements); - Most-favoured-nation (MFN)/non-discrimination Section II: Transparency of Investment Measures - Publication of measures and relevant information (including online publication) - Publication of… [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:09 am
New York. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied Petitioner's application holding that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363 and Plaintiff was awarded performance of duty retirement benefits. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied Petitioner's application holding that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363 and Plaintiff was awarded performance of duty retirement benefits. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
The New York State and Local Police and Fire Retirement System denied Petitioner's application holding that the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of Retirement and Social Security Law §363 and Plaintiff was awarded performance of duty retirement benefits. [read post]
