Search for: "ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF MAINE " Results 4681 - 4700 of 7,313
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2013, 9:07 am by Daniel Shaviro
  And I didn't take a position on whether, say, the transaction, and Thomson Reuters in particular, deserved the legal scrutiny that they apparently were receiving from the New York State Attorney General's office. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm by Jennifer R. Dixon
  Before the appeal was heard by the Second Circuit, the Solicitor General of the United States petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, which was ultimately granted, and both parties delivered oral arguments in late March of 2013. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 2:28 pm by Jennifer R. Dixon
  Before the appeal was heard by the Second Circuit, the Solicitor General of the United States petitioned the Supreme Court for certiorari, which was ultimately granted, and both parties delivered oral arguments in late March of 2013. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 8:27 am by KC Johnson
” No mention that the state’s attorney general declared the players “innocent”—not merely that the charges were “dropped. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 10:18 am by Rob Manchel
Robert Manchel, the bankruptcy attorney in NJ., can be contacted at 1 (866) 503-5655. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:42 am by Arina Shulga
This article is not a legal advice, and was written for general informational purposes only. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 8:10 am by Larry Tolchinsky
If you have a specific or personal situation, please call or email Larry because he can’t answer specific fact questions in general comments. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm by Vikram Raghavan
They had no particular recorded reaction to the Attorney General’s categorical statement that government had no quarrel with the High Court’s judgment. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:41 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Today, President Obama issued a statement about the ruling, saying, in part: So we welcome today’s decision, and I’ve directed the Attorney General to work with other members of my Cabinet to review all relevant federal statutes to ensure this decision, including its implications for Federal benefits and obligations, is implemented swiftly and smoothly. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 6:57 am by Allison Tussey
Acting Assistant Attorney General Mythili Raman of the Justice Department’s Criminal Division, U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:16 am by Daniel Richardson
  There is no right to effective counsel in civil cases; instead of getting reversal of the court judgment, civil litigants can generally just sue their ineffective lawyers for malpractice. [read post]
23 Jun 2013, 8:17 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Attorneys handling insurance claims would want to keep up with general news in the world of insurance. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
For example, the Military Commissions Act of 2009,1 which completely overhauled the Guantánamo Bay military commissions, was passed as Title XVIII of the 2010 NDAA.2 Likewise, the 2011–2013 NDAAs’ detention provisions—the main subject of this book—generated far more controversy and attention than the surrounding thousands of pages of appropriations provisions. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The present decision might be of interest for patent attorneys because it delves into some little known provisions of the regulations on discipline.Two patent attorneys of a Swedish law firm were dealing with the European patent application; only one of them (Mr C.) was entitled to act before the EPO, whereas the other (Mr G) was only a Swedish patent attorney. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am by Jeff Gamso
  But pretty much everyone agrees that at least a couple are, so let's just go with the generic fact. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Tarrant argued that the statutes, and the interpretation of them adopted by Oklahoma's attorney general, were preempted by Federal law and violated the Commerce Clause by discriminating against interstate commerce in water. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Tarrant argued that the statutes, and the interpretation of them adopted by Oklahoma's attorney general, were preempted by Federal law and violated the Commerce Clause by discriminating against interstate commerce in water. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 1:43 pm by WIMS
Tarrant argued that the statutes, and the interpretation of them adopted by Oklahoma's attorney general, were preempted by Federal law and violated the Commerce Clause by discriminating against interstate commerce in water. [read post]