Search for: "CHANCE v. STATE"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 12,119
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Don Chance, the Norman V. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:15 pm
Samsung or Oracle v. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 10:14 am
" White v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 11:02 am
Justices Souter and Scalia seemed to be arguing more with each other than with the attorneys on Tuesday, January 9, when the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Schriro v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 3:10 am
On this third point, Mr Justice Birss (as he then was) provided an explanation as to the German injunction gap and the interaction with UK patent proceedings at [14]-[19] of his decision, summarizing previous decisions (HTC v Apple, ZTE, v Ericsson, Garmin v Phillips) where Mr Justice Arnold (as he then was) consistently expressed the view that the presence of a possible German injunction gap "was a factor to take into account". [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm
., the Court will hear a state case, Riley v. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 7:21 am
” Here, “by committing an ever-increasing amount of State funds to paying State employee salaries or overtime,” the federal executive “can unilaterally deplete State resources, forcing the States to adopt or acquiesce to federal policies, instead of implementing State policies and priorities. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 6:58 am
In Krinsk v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:38 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:14 pm
At his sentencing before then-Judge, now Ohio Supreme Court Justice Judith Ann Lanzinger, here's what happened per the appellate court's opinion in State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 9:11 pm
In Taylor v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 4:30 pm
This absurd decision, Massachusetts v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 8:11 am
On Monday, the Supreme Court finally heard oral argument in Van Buren v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:02 am
Furthermore, we conclude that, because "the analysis employed by this [C]ourt in the prior appeal no longer reflects the current state of the law, the doctrine of law of the case should not be invoked to preclude reconsideration of" Charter Oak's motion to dismiss plaintiff's claim for compensatory damages (Szajna v Rand, 131 AD2d 840, 840; see Foley v Roche, 86 AD2d 887, lv denied 56 NY2d 507). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 9:14 am
The Washington Post reports that the Court’s decision in Skilling v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 10:19 am
In Prigg v. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
Only a few months after Italian Colors, the California Supreme Court got its first major chance to address the new landscape in Sonic-Calabasas A, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
But when a circuit split is combined with a sexy issue like preemption, that ups the chances of Supreme Court review enormously. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 5:03 pm
Without reaching trial or a verdict, the Dominion Voting Systems v. [read post]
