Search for: "California v. Law" Results 4681 - 4700 of 33,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2009, 6:00 am
    About six weeks ago, the US Supremes issued their pleading decision in Ashcroft v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by Pauline H. Tesler
The Newsletter of California's statewide organization, "Collaborative Practice California" (Vol. 2010-2) arrived today with David Fink's summary of the recent "Celebration V," (the annual meeting held this year in San Francisco) as a featured article. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 3:15 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  For nearly all that time, the firm also has written Miller & Starr, California Real Estate 3d, a 12-volume treatise on California real estate law. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 7:00 am by Buckingham
  Most states have modeled their law after the South Dakota law analyzed in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:07 am
Reading tea leaves isn't easy.The trial court overrules a demurrer, but certifies the issue as presenting a controlling issue of law, and defendant files a writ. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 10:09 am by David Faustman
The post Unions Breathe Big Sigh of Relief Over Compulsory Dues appeared first on California Employment Law. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:50 pm
Class Action Alleging Employer Misclassified Managers as Exempt and Failed to Pay them Overtime Wages Properly Decertified as Class Action because Amount of Time Spent on Managerial Duties Required Individual Inquiry and because “Individualized Issues of Liability and Damages will Predominate” California Appellate Court Holds Plaintiffs filed a putative class action against their employer, Tuesday Morning, alleging violations of California labor laws;… [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 11:43 am by Greg Mersol
The underlying case involves claimed wage and hour violations under both the FLSA and California state law. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 11:04 am by Lawrence Taylor
If you guilty of violating one of California’s laws mentioned above, this may be considered negligence per se, and you can be presumed negligent. [read post]