Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 4681 - 4700 of 16,703
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 6:50 am by Heidi Henson
An employer could not be held vicariously liable for an after-work accident caused by an employee who was on an extended assignment away from home, ruled the Arizona Supreme Court, resolving a dispute among state courts (Engler v Gulf Interstate Engineering, Inc, July 9, 2012, Berch, R). [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 1:24 pm
Substantively, the court avoids the questions of whether it will adopt  United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 3:18 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court unanimously dismissed Littlewoods’ cross-appeal stating that s 78 of the 1994 Act impliedly excludes its claims. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 9:51 am by Steven Cohen
  The court disagreed, stating that these arguments are best suited during cross examination. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 8:17 am
Co., 286 AD2d 679 [2001]), and the follow-up request was in proper form (see Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65-3.6 [b]; Doshi Diagnostic Imaging Servs. v State Farm Ins. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 6:50 am by Mack Sperling
Given that the RUAA was meant to bring the state arbitration act in line with the Federal Arbitration Act, the NC COA's opinion in WMS, Inc. v. [read post]