Search for: "Does 1 - 41"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 4,707
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2006, 3:13 pm
The reference in the link is to the cover of the original pleadings [back] For the family history of Mrs Donoghue and other interesting points about the case, see AF Rodger, "Mrs Donoghue and Alfenus Varus" (1988) 41 Current Legal Problems 1 and W. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 9:53 am
" [46] [1] U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 1:05 pm
However, with the December 1 effective date for the new rules looming, the Applied Discovery survey found that many corporations face uncertainty and exposure. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 11:58 am
P. 41(g) -- formerly Rule 41(e) for return of property. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
Currently the EITC does not provide any additional help for families with more than two children. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 11:59 am
See Section 8(b)(1)(B) of the Act. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 7:52 am
Pedagogically, what does this mean? [read post]
6 Nov 2006, 7:09 pm
§ 7-1-104.) [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 2:15 pm
In Reynolds, for example, the Court was faced with malapportioned legislative districts that gave some counties' votes a fraction the weight of others, by as much as a 41:1 margin. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:02 am
If your lease does this, you are in a danger zone. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
Accordingly, Chairman Battista and Member Kirsanow found that the systemwide presumption should apply here as it does in the natural gas pipeline cases, whether or not the Employer is deemed to be a "public utility. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 12:35 am
"The answer is yes, as this table by Coleman shows:............Minimum............number of........Actual BCS..................................Participants withYear.....violations........participants................................MinV adjustments1998.....41...................Tennessee, Florida St...................Tennessee (1), Florida St. (2)1999.....58...................Florida St., Va. [read post]
17 Oct 2006, 5:36 am
A: No, not really, we do not think these are so urgent. 9:58 Q: Does standard office equipment fall under the carve-out for free flow of information in Syria? [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 12:51 pm
A: Yes, try another day. 4:41 Q: What's are the proportions of filings by USPPI or agent? [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
29 Sep 2006, 4:57 am
I can hardly wait.Two-foot pizzaSection 2(a) - false connectionTTAB Citable No. 38: Board Affirms 2(a) Refusal of "MOHAWK" for CigarettesSection 2(a) - immoral or scandalous TTAB Affirms Refusal of "DE PUTA MADRE" for Clothing as Immoral or ScandalousSection 2(d) - likelihood of confusion Citable No. 45: TTAB Reverses 2(d) Refusal of Product Configuration MarkTTAB Sustains 2(d) "HALTIX & Design" Opposition, But Puts the Brakes on Fraud Claim No Joy in Mudville: TTAB… [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 7:07 am
P. 41(c)(1). [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 11:06 am
He further wrote that as argued by the General Counsel, "the Board has found that a striker's use of the most vile and vulgar language, including racial epithets, does not deprive him of the protection of the Act, so long as those actions do not constitute a threat. [read post]
12 Aug 2006, 7:14 am
(e) Information Available to Victims (1) In general. [read post]
21 Jul 2006, 8:30 am
(I re-numbered the paragraphs below to start with 1 ... also, the endnotes matter a great deal in this discussion.)***1. [read post]
