Search for: "English v. English"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 11,196
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2016, 2:16 pm
In the Article 8 defence English case law, the Supreme Court seemed pretty clear on the point, at least as a ‘general rule’, at para 61 of Manchester City Council v Pinnock [2011] 2 AC 104. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:52 am
La RFD/CJWL sollicite des textes relevant des catégories suivantes : articles, études de fond, commentaires de jurisprudence, études de cas, notes de recherche, recensions de livres, et observations sur les évènements nationaux et internationaux susceptibles d’intéresser notre lectorat. [read post]
8 May 2016, 9:52 am
La RFD/CJWL sollicite des textes relevant des catégories suivantes : articles, études de fond, commentaires de jurisprudence, études de cas, notes de recherche, recensions de livres, et observations sur les évènements nationaux et internationaux susceptibles d’intéresser notre lectorat. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:05 am
The glyphs used in Klingon are functional, and analogous to typeface designs (which are said in US law to be protectable as industrial designs only, per Adobe Sys. v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 7:42 am
The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear Star Athletica, LLC v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:41 am
Those reports rightly point to the €1,250,000 damages award in Leech v Independent Newspapers [2014] IESC 79 (19 December 2014). [read post]
3 May 2016, 4:18 am
Recently, in Capek v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:09 pm
Information on compliance is available only in English, as if no apartment manager or owner was more comfortable in a second language. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm
That’s where the imbalance comes: relatively manageable cost of doing business v. creation side is being killed by piracy and dealing w/great burdens from §512 to little effect. [read post]
2 May 2016, 10:03 am
Os argumentos abaixo seguem válidos, mas ainda não consideram a nova versão, que inclusive explicitam o foco do PL na proteção de direito autoral, patentes e programas de computador, propósitos comumente utilizados como ferramenta de censura. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Link to part 1- http://ukscblog.com/new-judgment-jetivia-sa-anor-v-bilta-uk-ltd-ors-2015-uksc-23-part-1/ [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:56 pm
In the case of V v Associated Newspapers Ltd ([2016] EWCOP 21) the Court of Protection ruled that where a court has restricted the publication of information during proceedings that were in existence during a person’s lifetime, it has not only the right but the duty to consider, when requested to do so, whether that information should continue to be protected following the person’s death. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 10:19 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit [Parhat v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:46 am
The patent in issue was previously litigated in Schlumberger v EMGS. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:47 am
The Court found that the right that Charterers were exercising should be classified as a contractual right and it followed that the Charterers were bound to accept that their claim was governed by English law and must be arbitrated in London. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:30 am
Mr Knowles began by explaining that the form of joint enterprise in question, Parasitic Accessorial Liability or “PAL”, was a distinct form of liability established by two cases, Chan Wing Siu v The Queen [1985] 1 AC 168 and R v Powell and English [1999] 1 AC 1. [read post]
