Search for: "French v. French"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 5,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 4:46 pm
Peninou French Laundry & Cleaners Inc., CGC-10-496203 (S.F. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:05 am
The Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in the case of Maher v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(IP tango) ECJ sets aside partial refusal to grant CTM for ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ (progress through technology): Audi AG v OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) (The IP Factor) ECJ: Davidoff criteria for exhaustion apply also if goods were first marketed within the EEA: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV and others v Diesel SpA (JIPLP) Time for a general grumble - General Court decisions missing images, no English version: G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, ESGW Holdings Ltd;… [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
By 1951, the court in Noble v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 10:44 am
By 1951, the court in Noble v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 7:29 pm
Furthermore, the self-satisfying speech published on the judgement Selmouni v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:25 am
This will piss off the French. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm
309/08, G-Star Raw Denim kft v OHIM, ESGW Holdings Ltd. [read post]
20 Jan 2010, 8:56 am
French counsel Philippe Cannone acknowledged that the Civil Parties had been disorganized at trial, but considered it a mistake to criticize those for whom the trial was convened and warned of efforts to silence the victims and render them, once again, "voiceless icons. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:58 am
In Lancôme v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 3:46 am
(Patent Infringement) District Court E D Texas: Defense wins JMOL at conclusion of plaintiff's case in Marshall patent trial: Southwest EFuel Network, LLC v Transaction Tracking Technologies, LLC (EDTexweblog.com) District Court E D Texas denies stays pending ex parte and inter partes reexam:Zapmedia Services, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 8:54 am
The first one was stricken for constitutional reasons and the second includes judicial oversight. 2: Report: Google/Viacom Case Set For Ruling Next up today, there are rumors that the Viacom v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 4:37 am
(IP Litigation Blog) District Court E D Virginia: Stay pending reexam denied because a stay would result in ‘more significant’ prejudice given the Court’s overall speed in disposing patent cases: Telecommunication Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:02 pm
Noriega was convicted in absentia there (but he apparently will be able to seek a new trial upon his surrender to French authorities). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 1:38 pm
Penal law Corporate criminal liability V. [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm
NB: This decision has also been reported here (in French). [read post]
3 Jan 2010, 6:47 am
However, the closure of the Argentina branch which has not been blacklisted and the drop in BNP Paribas makes the explanation by French bank executives unlikely.If the G-20 black list forced BNP Paribas to sell its Panama branch, why did BNP also sell their Argentine branch after doing business for 95 years? [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 10:25 am
Last year, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (”CAFC”) overturned the District Court decision in Jacobsen v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 9:53 am
The recent i4i v. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 5:39 am
Fortis Corporate Insurance v. [read post]
