Search for: "Good v. State of California"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 7,503
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2013, 11:47 am
In Young v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
The Court also turned aside a Maryland funeral home industry case, testing whether it is unconstitutional for states to discriminate against the interstate movement of investment capital, business expertise and profits, or do states act unconstitutionally only when they discriminate against movement of physical goods. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 6:21 am
Brady v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 8:39 am
Paris v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 7:45 am
Ken Vanko has a good wrap-up of some recent developments, including a discussion of a recent Pennsylvania case, Outdoor Lighting Perspectives Franchising, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 10:11 am
Whether a change to California law reducing good time credits for a prisoner is a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 10:46 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 8:49 am
There's an amazing development with respect to the ongoing Apple v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 7:50 pm
California, 134 S. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
To qualify as a bona fide purchaser, "one must acquire property in good faith, for value, and without notice of any third-party claim or interest. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:54 am
–State v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 9:28 pm
A group of California vineyard operators will be represented in the case of Horne v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 5:47 pm
June 1, 2020), and the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 8:14 am
Council v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously… [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 6:28 pm
Apple v. [read post]
14 Sep 2021, 12:26 pm
Chandra v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
California "clearly establish[es]," for purposes of habeas corpus review of state-court judgments under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
(Id.)U.S. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 3:57 pm
With Google’s Digital Credential API and Apple’s IP&V Platform (as named from the agreement with California), these two major companies are going to be in direct competition with current age verification platforms. [read post]
