Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 4681 - 4700 of 9,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Falwell (TTABlog) Test your TTAB judge-ability on this service mark specimen of use: In re Health Fusion Brands, Inc (TTABlog) [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 3:31 pm by litigationtech
" Gilliland's thoughts developed into the Deponent, which is designed to ask more questions than it answers. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:33 pm
 One was referred in October 2009, attracting a ruling in substantially less than two years, while the other hurtled past the judges' noses at almost the speed of light, having been referred as recently as April 2010. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:24 pm
Corgis: they enjoy have Royal patronage but,ultimately, they're still not cats ... [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:54 pm by Jeff Gamso
Mitchell, 1993), though, and while I can pontificate, they actually get to decide the question.But what they're doing in Queens is somewhat different.Rather than using the law to enhance punishments for crimes motivated by "invidious hatred toward particular groups," Rather, they're using the statute to enhance punishments on those who target the elderly because they're believed to have money and to be easy prey.They do that because the hate crime… [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:19 am by Bob Ambrogi
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges whittled the applications down to 26. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Increasingly determined by judge’s perception of right answer. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 7:57 am by Dave Wolkowitz
Our process is designed so that only our client has to go to court. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 10:48 pm by Florian Mueller
The credibility problem the '915 patent faces is that no one at the USPTO who looked at this patent after an anonymous requester presented some new invalidity theories-- by now, four persons: the (re)examiner and the three PTAB judges--believed at any point that a single claim of this patent deserved to be upheld. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 11:36 am by Kevin Goldberg
If you’re just getting to the Aereo party now and don’t know the background, check out our extensive Aereo-related coverage at this link. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 5:27 am
The judge went on to explain that in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am by Randy Barnett
Rejecting stare decisis when previous decisions conflict with the Constitution does not mean rejecting res judicata. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 12:57 pm
She was talking to a Virginia judge, who is an alumnus of Syracuse, about the Terry Schiavo case. [read post]
16 Sep 2012, 7:36 am by Thomas Heintzman
The Decisions The trial judge held that there was a valid contract. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Judge Eagan writes that the “substantial and engaging adversarial process to test the legality of this Court’s Orders under Section 215 . . . appears designed to ensure that there are additional safeguards in light of the lower threshold that the government is required to meet for production under Section 215 as opposed to Section 2703(d). [read post]