Search for: "John Does 1 through 3"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 4,731
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2007, 10:26 pm
The specious argument made by John Bair in his response to a query about my post "What Does Exclusive Mean To You? [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/08/07 REFERRED TO CODES01/30/07 1ST REPORT CAL.5901/31/07 2ND REPORT CAL.LAW / CORRECTNSS1905
SAMPSON -- Authorizes certain inmates serving an indeterminate sentence to receive good time allowances of up to 1/3 of their minimum sentencesSUMM : Amd SS803 & 805, Cor L Authorizes inmates serving indeterminate sentences of imprisonment for offenses involving controlled substances and marihuana to receive good time allowances against the minimum… [read post]
30 Jan 2007, 8:12 pm
3. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:10 pm
I want to be very clear about this particular issue, on the off chance anyone follows this sort of thing:1. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 10:21 am
". 3. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 4:02 pm
Does 1-7. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
John F. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:47 am
"Section 1396p(c)(1) does not apply to an annuity purchased by a third party with funds that never belonged to the applicant/beneficiary or community spouse. [read post]
21 Jan 2007, 11:23 am
" When Teleflex's attorney noted that his position is supported by the major patent bar associations, Chief Justice John Roberts retorted, "Which way does that cut? [read post]
20 Jan 2007, 12:21 am
The John Adam example was perfect. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 4:01 pm
3.) [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 6:39 am
; and (3) baseball's ban does drive drug use underground. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 5:48 am
., 407 U.S. 1, 92 S.Ct. 1907, 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972). . . . [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 11:13 pm
(Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.) [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 9:04 am
Law Judge John J. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 6:08 am
Comment ¶ 3 to Rule 3.1 addresses this specific problem: The lawyer’s obligations under this Rule are subordinate to federal or state constitutional law that entitles a defendant in a criminal matter to the assistance of counsel in presenting a claim or contention that otherwise would be prohibited by this Rule. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:26 pm
JOHN DOE, Defendant.Case Number: O-2004-1175COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF OKLAHOMA2006 OK CR 1; 127 P.3d 1135; 2006 Okla. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 6:17 am
Hence without further adieu, That Lawyer Dude Salutes:1. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 2:19 am
3. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 6:27 pm
It does not help that Sam's life sounds so much more interesting than mine, but here goes: 1. [read post]
