Search for: "Line v. Line" Results 4681 - 4700 of 45,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 8:32 am by Hunton & Williams LLP
  In line with traditional CAFA interpretation, the Court held that plaintiffs need only satisfy the aggregate $5,000,000 amount in controversy requirement.In its now-vacated July 2010 decision, Cappuccitti v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:23 am
Here's a link to the on-line abstract, which is the best we can do.Like Nagareda, Epstein says some things that we can use in briefs and some that we can't. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am by INFORRM
   Neither Sim v Stretch nor Jameel are directed to the issue and provide no clear support for the approach. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:11 am by admin
So what’s the bottom line for the lay person? [read post]