Search for: "Mays v. State" Results 4681 - 4700 of 119,072
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Just as one might think that Congress cannot impose deadlines (except in the text of an amendment itself) because the Article V process says nothing about deadlines, so one might conclude that states may not rescind a prior ratification because the Article V process gives them only one power: to ratify. [read post]
1 May 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
.: Whole Earth 3 Nut Butter recalled for not displaying a “contains nuts” warning on the jar [Katie Morley, Telegraph] “Community College Reportedly Bans Pro-Second-Amendment Banner with Picture of Rifles” [Eugene Volokh] More on the dubious “hate crimes have surged” narrative, from Will Reilly of Kentucky State, who has a new book out [Nolan Finley, Detroit News, earlier] In Lamps Plus v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:28 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
May 31, 2012) (memorandum opinion re: class certification) (available here). [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 11:36 am
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in  Pottawattamie County v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:55 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
Brandt To better understand the current status of grandparent visitation in the state, we need to discuss a case called Moriarty v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 6:55 am by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
Brandt To better understand the current status of grandparent visitation in the state, we need to discuss a case called Moriarty v. [read post]
Employment issues to consider while awaiting decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”) will imminently release its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization, and if the final ruling is consistent with the recently-leaked draft opinion (overturning Roe v Wade and Planned Parenthood v Casey), employers may soon need to contend with a variety of novel… [read post]
2 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
  This Court had held in Stolt-Nielsen that a court may not compel classwide arbitration when an agreement is silent on the availability of such arbitration. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:38 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
United States, which relied on an earlier First Circuit decision (United States v. [read post]