Search for: "POST PROPERTIES, INC."
Results 4681 - 4700
of 9,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2015, 9:55 pm
The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) will be offering a webinar entitled "Patent Eligibility Post-Alice: Practical Advice for Navigating the Current 35 USC § 101 Regime" on January 20, 2016 from 12:30 - 2:00 pm (Eastern). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 12:00 am
So you then need to go to case law to see how the courts interpret and apply that distinction.A seminal case distinguishing a food from a drug is Nutrilab, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 6:41 pm
Planetary Resources, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
In the annals of cultural property law, prosecutions targeting transnational antiquities trafficking networks are rare. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 10:33 am
AT&T, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 8:31 am
Haunted Hotel, Inc. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:55 am
Axiom Worldwide, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:02 am
., Inc., 2015 WL 8551102, No. 3:15–CV–02099 (D.P.R. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 9:26 am
Only “trade secrets,” however, are protected post-termination under certain circumstances. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 7:21 am
Inc. clarified that product configuration marks can never be inherently distinctive. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
This post examines an opinion from the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:39 am
Sound Inpatient Physicians Medical Group, Inc., No. 14-cv-00497, 2015 WL 8539034 (E.D. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:36 am
This post examines an opinion from a U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 5:01 am
But viewpoint-based restrictions are unconstitutional, even when the government is specifying which signs people may post on public property. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:01 pm
The AmeriKat has returned to summarise the second part of last week's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on trade secrets (see previous AmeriKat post here). [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 5:55 am
” Caterpillar, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 11:18 am
Jay Peak, Inc. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 10:45 am
Escobar’s doppelganger Triple Canopy, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:36 am
Use of Proceeds: operations Distributions: at board’s discretion (9% dividend is cumulative) Liquidity: no secondary market; conversion to common stock is mandatory after 5 years No underwriter Securities may be offered by registered broker-dealers No voting rights (company is controlled by common stockholders) Investment requires binding arbitration Legal fees: $30,000 Fundrise Real Estate Investment Trust, LLC $50,000,000 Common Shares Tier 2 offering to accredited and non-accredited… [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:37 pm
See Sweetheart Plastics, Inc. v. [read post]
