Search for: "People v Word"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 17,914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Sep 2019, 2:00 pm
(And it's not even shy about it.)The statute requires actual possession to establish guilty, but that's because the Legislature -- and I'm convinced that Justice Humes is correct here -- accidentally left out the word "or" when it amended the statute. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 5:04 am
The Supreme Court and some commentators believe that the threat of being sued and the imposition of damages liability overdeter officers, discourage people from entering government service, and threaten government budgets. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 2:54 pm
In the 1966 case of People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:11 pm
The wealth of the industry is, and has historically been, built on the backs of poor people (most often people of color) charged with a crime. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:13 am
§ 404.1527(d)(2) Schmidt v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am
Many religious people are understandably upset when they have to subsidize blasphemy. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 8:42 am
In Moses v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 5:49 am
Sensing the judge’s dismay, “Kleindienst sought to justify his plan, larding his presentation with words about Reds, scum, etc. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
“If not in this case, then the words justiciable in principle are… empty words. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 9:37 am
” Schiff surmised that it was fair to conclude that it involves the president, or people around the president or both. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 5:43 am
From Hamor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 12:37 pm
Such guidelines could bring about a more appropriate interpretation of openly-worded connecting factors such as e.g. the characteristic performance or the closest connection. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
In other words, Defendant contends the license to sell the “Musical Journeys” under the agreement remains in effect. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 7:10 pm
Prior to the licensing of paralegals in Ontario, the Ontario Court of Appeal reviewed the issue of agents in R. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 2:10 pm
New Mexico, though, just rejected that rule a couple of weeks ago (in State v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:37 pm
In 1920, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 1:19 pm
He is like an arrow pointed towards a goal of illuminating science for people. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm
Moreover, as a matter of first principle, people shouldn't need government permission to work. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
In Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 8:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
