Search for: "R L L" Results 4681 - 4700 of 43,195
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2020, 6:30 am by Comunicaciones_MJ
El Panel determina[,] además, consolidar este caso con el que se encuentra bajo investigación de la exsenadora [María Teresa González López]. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:11 pm by Forrest G. Read IV
In the proclamations the President issued in April and June 2020 that block the entry of immigrants and non-immigrants in H, L, and J status, the Secretaries of State, Homeland Security, and Labor were ordered to issue regulations to ensure foreign nationals would not disadvantage U.S. workers. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 10:00 pm by Emmanuel Barthe
Publier sur Internet, sans illusion Ça fait un moment que je m'interroge sur l'intérêt de participer au débat public à travers mon blog et Twitter. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 12:57 pm by Christine Beltempo
Suite à une tentative échouée de réforme du Programme de l’expérience québécoise (PEQ) en novembre 2019, le Ministère de l’Immigration, de la Francisation et de l’Intégration (MIFI) a dû retirer une grande partie de son nouveau règlement et tenir des consultations publiques en vue de présenter un nouveau projet de réforme. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:12 pm
Contents include:Special Issue: New Technologies and Global Environmental PoliticsSimon Nicholson & Jesse L. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 11:36 am by Aimee Guthat
Certain types of business immigration petitions have been targeted for large percentage fee increases: 51% for TNs and E visas, 75% for L petitions, and 53% for O petitions. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
“Every route of viral transmission would go down if we talked less, or talked less loudly, in public spaces,” Jose L. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:00 am by jweil
Regular Law Division lawsuits seek to collect more than $15,000 and their docket numbers have “L” in them instead of “DC”. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:00 am by jweil
Regular Law Division lawsuits seek to collect more than $15,000 and their docket numbers have “L” in them instead of “DC”. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Le rejet de cette théorie peut alors s’expliquer par le fait qu’elle ouvre la porte à l’indemnisation d’un préjudice qui résulte indirectement de la faute, ce qui est contraire à l’article 1607 C.c.Q.[55]. [read post]