Search for: "SUMMERS v. STATE" Results 4681 - 4700 of 5,456
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2024, 5:19 am by Phil Dixon
Applying the historical tradition test from New York Rifle & Pistol Ass’n v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by Eric Turkewitz
The room was stuffed with lawyers, defendants, summer associates and others. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:21 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Gries, Michael Kranzlein, Nathan Schneider, Brian Slocum, and Kevin Tobia In Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 8:36 am by Brian Gallini
  In the summer of 2009, I dedicated myself to learning the method and have since written about it. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 10:52 am by Lindsay Colvin Stone
Such actions include disparate treatment in: (i) hiring, firing, promotion, demotion, compensation, fringe benefits, job duties, and/or work assignments; (ii) access to or exclusion from training, including training characterized as leadership development programs; (iii) access to mentoring, sponsorship, or workplace networking; (iv) internships, including those labeled as “fellowships” or “summer associate” programs; and (v) selection for interviews,… [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The three trials are as follows: 5 April 2016, Umeyor v Ibe, 5 days; 18 April 2016, Undre v London Borough of Harrow, 2 days.;  23 May 2016, Theedom v Nourish Training, 3-4 days. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In Hoffman v Challis [2016] NSWSC 142 made various rulings on imputations pleaded by the plaintiff. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 4:24 am by Peter J. Sluka
  As we return to our desks after the coldest Christmas in recent memory, it’s tempting to daydream about a summer day on her deck: drink in hand, wind filling the sails, and an easy heel giving way to weary legs and sea-tossed hair…. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 3:50 am by Sean Wajert
   That decision offered an interesting discussion of choice of law, and of the notion of commonality after Dukes v. [read post]