Search for: "State of California v. United States" Results 4681 - 4700 of 13,839
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2017, 3:15 am by Barry Sookman
9th Circuit Finds No Infringement in Steinbeck Family Feud https://t.co/IGk8NsUayr 2017-11-19 Everyone has been hacked, say police | News | The Times & The Sunday Times https://t.co/LUKYEqUp29 2017-11-19 United States: A Collection of Articles Commemorating Zeran v. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Rev __ (2018 Forthcoming), Eumi Lee, University of California Hastings College of the Law. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The land was divided into two units: 608 acres of state park land (Washoe Meadows State Park), and the remainder designated as Lake Valley State Recreation Area to allow continuing operation of an existing golf course (a use not allowed in state parks). [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 8:51 am by Victoria Kwan
United States, with Justice Clarence Thomas watching from the audience. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:18 pm by John Elwood
Becerra, 16-1140 (presenting a challenge to a California law requiring crisis-pregnancy centers to provide visitors with certain notices); four-time relist Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This statement allegedly violates California law because more than ten percent of the condoms’ wholesale value allegedly derives from natural latex material produced outside of the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 5:42 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
But remember that an allegation is just that, an allegation, and in the United States the accused is entitled to the protection of due process (See U.S. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 2:06 pm
See The Supreme Court’s next (cautious, careful) move into the digital age: "A new era of cutting-age technology begins Monday at the United States Supreme Court, as the public for the first time will be able to access briefs and other case documents on the court’s website. [read post]
In her order granting a new trial, the district court judge directed the parties to argue using the above factors articulated by the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:14 am by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates (NIFLA) v. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]