Search for: "State v. Brown" Results 4681 - 4700 of 8,850
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2011, 2:33 pm by James Bickford
At Monday’s oral argument in DePierre v. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 10:05 am by JB
Or it would require that the Constitution explicitly states that no rights of this kind exist.For many years everyone assumed that there was absolutely no way that Roe v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Daniel Nazer
Adding to the strangeness of today’s ruling, the same three-judge panel simultaneously issued an excellent free speech decision in Brown v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:37 am by Andrew Koppelman
The Equal Protection Clause is the reason the Court has struck down laws that impose certain inequalities, such as the race discrimination that was challenged in Brown v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 12:59 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Take Our Poll# 7 American Indian education 2014 was the 60th year since Brown v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
Brown (06-939), on whether federal labor law preempts a California statute barring employers from using state money to influence union organizing campaigns. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 5:22 am by Amy Howe
” At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Brian Netter and Dan Himmelfarb discuss the brief filed by the United States in Fifth Third Bancorp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:12 am by Amy Howe
”  And in Education Week (with graphic here), Mark Walsh surveys the Court’s education docket (or lack thereof), observing that “one would have to go back before the court’s landmark decision in Brown [v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
The State's immunity waiver applies equally to its municipal subdivisions, including cities (see Valdez v City of New York, 18 NY3d 69, 75 [2011]; Florence v Goldberg, 44 NY2d 189, 195 [1978]). [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am by John Elwood
Brown, 11-391, and Clarksburg Nursing Home & Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]