Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 32,533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2012, 5:49 am
The need to use force is an inherent part of a police officer's duties. . . . [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 8:54 pm
State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 12:55 pm
State, 72 Ga. 164 (1883); People v. [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 3:02 am
Indiana oral argument, Court seems sympathetic to idea of applying Excessive Fines clause to the states [Robby Soave, Jacob Sullum, Ilya Somin, earlier here, here, and here] Notwithstanding Justice Gorsuch and Kavanaugh’s interjections, there is and has been no uniform incorporation of the entire Bill of Rights against the states [Rory Little] Arizona Supreme Court should recognize that First Amendment protects right of calligraphic art studio not to be forced… [read post]
15 May 2009, 1:02 am
State of Bihar, [AIR 1989 SC 1456], Muniappan v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 4:03 pm
45835/05, § 68, 31 July 2012; Dammann v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:33 am
Ryll v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 6:31 am
The Court of Appeals of Washington examined this issue in State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
In Alberta v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:22 am
A Michigan judge Tuesday blocked the enforcement of a 1931 state law which would ban abortions in the event Roe v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm
State v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:17 am
State v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 3:10 pm
Supreme Court's observation in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 5:53 am
Supreme Court ruled 6-3 in Michigan Dept. of State Police v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:09 am
In balancing these two rights, Tugendhat J had in mind the “ultimate balancing test” as referred to by Lord Steyn Re S (A Child) [2005] 1 AC 593 (at para 17) and guidance from Lord Bingham in R v Shayler [2003] 1 AC 247 (at para 26) that interference of the ECHR right must not be stricter than necessary to achieve the state’s legitimate aim. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 1:55 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting judgment in Case C-118/07 Commission v Finland on the need to amend existing bilateral agreements with non member countries concluded by a member State before it acceded to the EU. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:22 am
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 10 (D.C. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:28 pm
Connolly v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 1:50 pm
After nearly ninety minutes of oral arguments today in King v. [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
As Canada begins to settle in with the new “notice and notice” provisions under the Copyright Act (Canada) which came into force January 2, 2015 copyright owners in Canada still need to address infringing content posted on websites hosted in the United States. [read post]
