Search for: "State v. Good Bear"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 5,195
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2009, 11:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:18 am
If it's the latter, then it seems Delaware has a pretty good argument to make.3. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 1:02 am
The goods in question were premium-priced products, targeted at that niche group of consumers. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 6:02 am
Law Lessons from Khoury v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 9:58 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 7:43 am
The Second Circuit ruled that the removal of the UPC alone constitutes trademark infringement, even if the goods bear the trademark and are genuine. [read post]
21 Jul 2009, 9:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:50 pm
Reinforces Cost-Shifting: In Toshiba v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:31 am
The Court of Justice of the European Communities handed down its decision in Case C-385/07 P Der Grüne Punkt-Duales System Deutschland GmbH v European Commission, supported by Vfw AG, Landbell AG and BellandVision GmbH, nearly 26 months after the ruling of the Court of First Instance which this 198 paragraph decision upholds.For those whose memory may not instantly recall the decision of 24 May 2007 or the facts that led to it, let the IPKat recap ...The German… [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 8:17 pm
Stockman v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:46 am
(Good punt, SS!) [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Well the good news from Wiley v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:36 pm
" It has been a truism since Marbury v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 1:40 pm
Supreme Court and American society at large, even post Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 8:32 am
Ricci v. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Summerhill v. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 3:47 am
Because this case arises in state court, it seems like a good vehicle for recognizing the truly substantive nature of the doctrine. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:35 pm
For the public, advertising is a means of discovering the characteristics of services and goods offered to them. [read post]
