Search for: "State v. House"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 28,796
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 3:45 pm
" The opinion in State of Washington v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:52 am
Further, applying RR v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 52 it was possible to disapply the discriminatory parts of the regulations to give JA a remedy without her needing to make a separate human rights claim. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:30 pm
The issue in Florence v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
State of Texas v. [read post]
Will the United States survive the 2016 election (and 2017 Inauguration of Donald Trump)? Continuing
22 Feb 2017, 1:13 pm
Tomorrow I shall teach Prigg v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 8:02 pm
See United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
Boice v. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:50 am
The Hons obtained their judgment in the New York State Supreme Court, New York County, in an action captioned Hon v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 12:42 pm
Ms Butler stated that as of 16 August 2022, on the Defendant’s register, there were 369 applicants for a one-bedroom property and in 2021-2022 only 13 such properties were let through the register, other than sheltered housing. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:44 pm
When it heard oral argument in Pearson v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 5:59 am
State, 2009 Md. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 4:51 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 6:01 am
In the wake of last summer’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
In Khan v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
She then instructed solicitors ho made further representations, including that it had been held that the benefits cap “indirectly discriminated against women over men” (citing the Supreme Court decision in R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2019] UKSC 21, [2019] 1 WLR 3289). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:29 am
RT (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and KM v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 18 – 19 June 2012. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:29 pm
Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 10:51 am
State of Nebraska and Department of Education v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:22 pm
How well the Act’s mechanisms work is open to debate (and must be considered in the context of the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]
