Search for: "State v. Laws" Results 4681 - 4700 of 156,382
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2009, 7:02 am by Paul Venard
The Supreme Court last year ruled in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
Iqbal, the United States Supreme Court confused the law of supervisory liability. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 9:50 am by Public Employment Law Press
New York State Civil Service Rule 4 NYCRR 5.3(d), since repealed, permitted the appointing authority of a State department or agency employee to terminate a tenured employee in the Classified Service absent for a period of ten or more days without an explanation by deeming the employee to have resigned from his or her position. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  The article is available to members of the State Bar Labor and Employment Law Section. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 5:52 am by Ted Frank
Speaking of upside-down preemption, the United States faced a lot of skepticism from the Supreme Court yesterday over its aggressive attempt to strike down Arizona's anti-illegal-immigration law, SB 1070. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature repealed Civil Rights Law §50-a [see Chapter 96, Laws of 2020] and made several related amendments to the State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], providing that such changes "shall take effect immediately". [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The legislature repealed Civil Rights Law §50-a [see Chapter 96, Laws of 2020] and made several related amendments to the State's Freedom of Information Law [FOIL], providing that such changes "shall take effect immediately". [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 2:42 pm by Orin Kerr
The Utah Supreme Court also joined in, agreeing that the good faith exception applies for changing law: State v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am by Aidan Wills, Matrix
Nor did Janowiec v Russia (2013) App nos. 55508/07 and 29520/09 assist the claimant. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:31 pm by Elizabeth Reese
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:36 am
Termination from Civil Service Law §71 Workers’ Compensation LeaveMatter of Richard Lazzari v Town of Eastchester, 62 AD3d 1002§71 of the Civil Service Law provides for the granting of “workers’ compensation leave” to an employee of the State or a political subdivision of the State who is disabled as the result of a work-connected injury or disease where such injury or disease does not [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 10:00 pm
And since this was a “state highway,” and the Towns did not assume any effort, nor had any duty, to maintain same, the AD4 left the dismissal undisturbed.Contrary to the plaintiffs’ argument, state law [Highway Law § 327] did not require a town to light the road, but affords it the ability to provide for same, should it so choose. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 6:21 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Contents include:Romola Adeola, Bridging the Accountability Gap in the Protection of Internally Displaced Persons: Non-State Actors Under the Kampala ConventionMariana Clara de Andrade, General Principles of Procedural Law in the Practice of the WTO Appellate Body Marco Longobardo, The Standing of Indirectly Injured States in the Litigation of Community Interests before the ICJ: Lessons Learned and Future Implications in Light of The Gambia v. [read post]