Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 5,862
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am
In a case with sympathies on both sides, the Supreme Court unanimously held on Monday in Turner v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:39 am
Wells, which was joined by Justices Sotomayor and Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:00 am
That was the practical upshot of the ruling in the highly-watched case Dukes v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:28 am
First, the opinion, before reaching the merits, states that 4 votes (without Justice Sotomayor weighing in) remain in support of Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am
June 20, 2011), and the class action case, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 2:19 pm
The Court’s decision in American Electric Power v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm
The ruling in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:29 pm
United States, further paring back applicability of the exclusionary rule, while Sotomayor penned J.B.D. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:36 pm
Just this morning, the United States Supreme Court released its long-awaited opinion in Wal-Mart v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 12:02 pm
Breyer, Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:31 am
While the final vote of the Justices against such “public nuisance” lawsuits was unanimous (although Justice Sonia Sotomayor did not take part), the Court split 4-4 on another issue in the American Electric case: whether states, cities and private land-conservation groups had a right even to go to court with such a lawsuit. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:13 am
Dukes and that the EPA's governance of carbon-dioxide regulation under the Clean Air Act displaced the federal common law public nuisance suit brought by various states and municipalities in AEP v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:06 am
The court ruled that at least one plaintiff had standing by an equally divided court as Justice Sonia Sotomayor... [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
(Sotomayor, J., recused.) [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:28 am
Justice Sotomayor recused herself since she was a member of the Second Circuit when it heard oral arguments in Connecticut v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
As anticipated, the Supreme Court of the United States this morning reversed the district court's order in Dukes v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:04 am
Power Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:56 am
(Only four of the eight justices deciding the case–Justice Sotomayor having recused herself–apparently believed that the states had legal standing to pursue the lawsuit, just enough to leave that aspect of the Second Circuit’s decision undisturbed.) [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:43 am
Finally, the plaintiffs are left with a possible claim under state law. [read post]
