Search for: "State v. Square" Results 4681 - 4700 of 6,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2006, 10:00 pm
The obesity epidemic triggered a significant increase in the cost of health-care in the United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 10:28 am by Richard Hunt
That left the state law claims in the wrong court, so the case was remanded to the state court. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
The adjudication states: “The article under complaint was a feature on Gary Dobson and David Norris, who had recently been convicted of the murder of Stephen Lawrence. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm by Tobias Lutzi
The Court found that such an action does not involve the assessment of facts or the application of rules and practices of the locus rei sitae in such a way as to justify conferring jurisdiction on a court of the State in which the property is situated (Case C-722 Reitbauer, [48]; see also C-115/88 Reichert I, [12]). [read post]
31 May 2023, 5:01 am by Rick Garnett
The best-known instance and illustration of Justice Breyer's church-state intuitions is his concurring opinion in Van Orden v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:31 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Two months later, the City filed an NOE for the Project, stating the Project was a retail use to be constructed in two phases, the first 138,722 square feet and the second 68,888 square feet. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
Federal preemption of state tort claims BIC Pen Corp. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 1:34 pm
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 7:59 am
" That led the court to a consideration of prior English case law as well of that of other EPC member states. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:36 am by Joy Waltemath
More importantly, the Second Circuit stated, the conclusion in Sacks is no longer tenable following the Supreme Court’s decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 4:56 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The ultra-bare bones Sale Agreement, which Bakr claimed proved the existence of a general partnership, stated that Bakr bought a 33% interest in a “mobile food vending operating location” in Times Square. [read post]