Search for: "T-UP v. Consumer Protection"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 4,767
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2007, 12:41 pm
Such a decision was the Eighth Circuit's ruling in Watson v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 1:13 am
Pearson originally sued Custom Cleaners for about $65 million under the District of Columbia consumer protection act and almost $2 million in common law claims. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 8:20 am
What the IPKat says: please don't take this as a reflection of anything that the IPKat might be doing in his spare time, but he was particularly interested in the two contributions on paternity rights. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
" We've come up with a couple of alternatives. [read post]
22 May 2007, 2:29 pm
Rasmussen, "The Story of Case v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:32 pm
" Great consumer protections, and no one subject to them. [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:17 am
Attorney Alex V. [read post]
16 May 2007, 2:12 pm
If consumers are deceived, the parody is a failure and protecting it serves no social purpose. [read post]
15 May 2007, 1:41 pm
[The IPKat says, surely not - lots of marks applied for and opposed under Art.4(4)(a) will be unused, and so won't be able to have had such an effect on consumers]. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:03 am
[quotation from §314.70(c) omitted] Section 314.70(c) creates a specific procedure allowing drug manufacturers to change labels that are insufficient to protect consumers, despite their approval by the FDA. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:25 am
No one is wise enough to craft a polity from the ground up. [read post]
11 May 2007, 10:25 am
No one is wise enough to craft a polity from the ground up. [read post]
7 May 2007, 2:19 pm
Family Investment Corporation v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 3:13 pm
Trademarks Most bloggers don't have a trademark to protect, but large corporations do. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:08 am
He'd rather hector the OCC and other federal regulators into stepping up their enforcement of state consumer protection laws where state enforcement has been preempted. [read post]
28 Apr 2007, 6:55 am
Some of my best friends are consumers and they don't drool. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:48 pm
Alaska Statutes § 09.17.010; State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 3:10 pm
WhenU and Rescuecom v. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 12:40 am
King Ranch IP, LLC v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 4:39 am
The FCC is implementing new regulations to require password protection and opt-in for consumers. [read post]
