Search for: "Towne v. Towne" Results 4681 - 4700 of 8,458
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 6:58 pm by Alice O'Brien
Today, the Supreme Court cast aside the interests of working people and their families, as well as the management concerns of 21 states, the District of Columbia, leaders of major cities, towns and school districts, and the views of constitutional scholars from across the political spectrum, to overrule Abood v. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The appeal will consider whether section 61N of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 should be interpreted to mean that the Appellant’s application for judicial review was made out of time. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
The unsworn began innocently enough, with LTC Lakin stating he was born in 1965 in Greeley, Colorado, a small town in rural northeast Colorado. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:23 am
Where, as here, a case is tried without a jury, this Court's power to review the evidence is as broad as that of the trial court, "taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses'" (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499, quoting York Mortgage Corp. v Clotar Costr., 254 NY 128, 133-134). [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 3:55 am by Ben
Those pesky TurtlesIt seems SiriusXM has decided to rely on the 1940 case of  RCA v Whiteman et al to persuade  U.S. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
Governor Romney ordered town clerks to strictly enforce the law when handing out marriage licenses. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 6:19 am by The Swartz Law Firm
The three plaintiff’s in Paez v Mulvey case were police officers of the Golden Beach, Florida police department were arrested in 2011 on various charges of public corruption. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 1:27 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
The Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts recently decided an easement dispute involving a nature preserve and a neighboring landowner in Taylor v. [read post]