Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant" Results 4681 - 4700 of 9,107
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2015, 1:00 pm
  Since several of us practice in the Keystone State (technically it’s a commonwealth), it’s the Pennsylvania law rulings that interest us here.As it should have (and as occurred in Runner), the court followed established Pennsylvania law and granted summary judgment against all claims that smacked of strict liability. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:00 am by Joy Waltemath
After the district court dismissed some claims and granted summary judgment on others, he appealed. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:17 pm
 She also adverted to Alice Corporation v CLS [noted on the IPKat here], to which the other speakers would later refer. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 6:38 am by John Mikhail
”  This statement sounds very much like the interpretive principle underlying one of John Marshall’s most famous remarks in McCulloch v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 2:44 am by Lyle Denniston
   It would have taken the votes of four Justices to grant review. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm by Jarod Bona
In this case, the Court held that regardless of whether it used quick look or rule or reason, it would grant the preliminary injunction. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm by Jarod Bona
In this case, the Court held that regardless of whether it used quick look or rule or reason, it would grant the preliminary injunction. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm by Jarod Bona
In this case, the Court held that regardless of whether it used quick look or rule or reason, it would grant the preliminary injunction. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
  The European Commission appears supportive of the process of data mining, having outlined in ‘A Single Digital Market Strategy for Europe’ that the use of text and date mining:“… may be hampered because of an unclear legal framework and divergent approaches at national level. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 7:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Granting the Secretary’s motion for partial summary judgment, the court concluded that most of the factors usually considered by courts within the Ninth Circuit weighed in favor of a finding of joint employer status (Perez v. [read post]