Search for: "United States v. California" Results 4681 - 4700 of 13,835
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
For reasons that confound, the employer decided it was a good idea to challenge the removal petition - the case originated in State court - on the grounds that removal jurisdiction violated Article I, § 10 of the United States Constitution - the so-called impairment-of-contracts clause. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:17 am by Rachel Sandler
” Recently, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York provided a ruling of fair use for a YouTube video under similar circumstances of comment and criticism in Hosseinzadeh v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 1:40 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States 17-8 Issues: (1) Whether a tribe that opted out of the Indian Reorganization Act can revive its status under that Act through the Indian Land Consolidation Act, 25 U.S.C. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
United States, 16-1320. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:34 am by Ben
It would be very dangerous to deny relief in this instance”.There were no representatives of either Equustek or the Canadian Supreme Court in attendance, and Judge Edward Davila agreed with Google’s request for a preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:08 am by Florian Mueller
This morning's Supreme Court order list indicates that Samsung's petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) in the second California Apple v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 4:18 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The compromise was that the federal courts could effectively overturn a state judgment on a ground decided by the state courts if that decision was "contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:13 pm by robin.hall@capstonelawyers.com
Complaining that California “leads the field” in circumventing United States Supreme Court’s pro-arbitration precedent Concepcion, Prudential Overall Supply petitioned for certiorari on August 15, 2017, seeking review of California’s Fourth Appellate District’s ruling that claims under California’s Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) cannot be arbitrated. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 10:00 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
The case since has settled.Computer Fraud and Abuse ActThe most significant CFAA case of the past several years has been United States v. [read post]