Search for: "United States v. Fields"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 5,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2022, 11:17 am
This is especially true for essay mills, most of which are based outside the United States. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 12:20 pm
United States, 729 F.2d 1429, 1435–36 (Fed. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 1:52 am
The code specifically states “The first option”, so evidently, this is where many homelessness units in areas of high demand, think London, are going to focussing their efforts….as the code advises them to. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 1:52 am
The code specifically states “The first option”, so evidently, this is where many homelessness units in areas of high demand, think London, are going to focussing their efforts….as the code advises them to. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:54 am
The qui tam case is captioned United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 5:16 am
I am of course referring to United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
The Public and the Courts , Greg Caldeira Part VIII: The Political and Policy Environment of Courts in the United States 35. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
Sacramento v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
Ferrer, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 2:38 am
Since 1984, the United States has only experienced ~12 years (30.8%) of unified government. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:43 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested… [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm
” And, as to lifetime detention of U.S. persons, the bill by its very terms (thanks to an amendment introduced by Senator Feinstein) confirms what would have been the proper reading anyway—namely, that its detention authorization provision (section 1021) does not “affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in… [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:51 pm
This well-settled principle is common to the United States and India. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:03 am
Roe v. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
Dickinson v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Comparing WTO Panelists and ICSID Arbitrators: The Creation of International Legal Fields Jose Augusto Fontoura Costa Abstract: Who are people who make the decisions in trade and investment dispute settlement systems? [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Miss United States of America, LLC. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 9:00 am
Perhaps one day decisions like Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
