Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 4681 - 4700 of 21,068
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2018, 8:15 am by Larry
The United States Department of Agriculture has the important obligation to protect American farms, orchards, forests, parks and backyards against the damage that can be caused by plant diseases and pests that enter the United States through our ports of entry. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm
Lynch, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, and Robert J. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:26 am by Steven Koprince
The United States, No. 12-173C (Nov. 27, 2012), held that the VA reasonably interpreted the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 as not requiring consideration of a SDVOSB set-aside before the VA procures goods and services under the Federal Supply Schedule. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:26 am by Steven Koprince
The United States, No. 12-173C (Nov. 27, 2012), held that the VA reasonably interpreted the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 as not requiring consideration of a SDVOSB set-aside before the VA procures goods and services under the Federal Supply Schedule. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 1:46 pm by Chris Jaglowitz
Noteworthy costs awards were recently released in Middlesex Condominium Corporation No. 232 v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:40 pm
Indigo Vapor Enterprises is in the business of selling "vaping" and e-cigarette materials across the United States and throughout the world. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm
  Commercial developments - The Supreme Court of the United States ruled in the case of Kelo v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 1:56 pm
The FLSA requires all employers in the United States to pay workers engaged in commerce or the production of goods for commerce the prevailing minimum wage. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 3:25 pm
Otero of the United States District Court for the Central District of California has ruled in UMG Recordings v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:03 pm by James McComish
A recent case in the Supreme Court of Victoria provides a good opportunity to point out the new statutory provisions in the State of Victoria for the proof of foreign law, and to discuss the public policy reasons for the non-enforcement of foreign law. [read post]