Search for: "United States v. Grant" Results 4681 - 4700 of 25,343
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2020, 9:00 am
In late July 2020, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motion to dismiss in a case involving releases of uranium radiation and other non-radioactive waste onto plaintiffs’ property. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:06 pm by Ray Dowd
Egon Schiele's Seated Woman with Bent Left Leg (Torso) 1917A petition was docketed this Monday asking the US Supreme Court to review a case where state law was used to grant title to a stolen artwork to a US purchaser. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:00 am
Rosenstengel, Chief Justice of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, partially denied and partially granted Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in The Premcor Refining Group Inc., v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:20 am by Rahul Bhagnari
Two years to the day after the Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act in United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 9:35 am
The Court heard argument on Monday in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 12:15 pm by Jeffrey Kahn
United States and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd (used with permission, www.courtartist.com) How should citizens in a republic bound by the rule of law regard the pretextual use of law by state officials? [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm by Mitchell Jagodinski
United States 21-68Issues: (1) Whether Standard Condition 12 of the U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2024, 12:41 pm by Unknown
(Arbitration Agreement; Tribal Law) United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 8:06 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
In an order issued on October 1, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Hadden v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 3:02 am
., issue preclusion) based on a prior TTAB decision [TTABlogged here], the United States District Court for the District of Maryland granted Defendant PNC's motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Ashe's complaint for trademark infringement. [read post]