Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 4681 - 4700 of 10,197
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
United States, a Clean Water Act case that “would clarify the incoherence of the government’s definition of ‘navigable waters,’ while serving to restrain regulatory agencies from further vindictive actions against property owners. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 3:11 am by Amy Howe
United States “retroactive have focused on the three circuits where prisoners are being denied permission to file successive petitions,” that focus “is a mistake. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 8:01 am by Herb Lin, Amy Zegart
Capitol in the United States (in this title referred to as the “Commission”). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the court upheld the convictions of the defendants in a notorious murder trial over a claim that evidence had been suppressed in violation of Brady v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 3:49 pm by Stephen Wermiel
On July 24, the justices ruled 8-0 in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 5:23 pm
Roberts Jr., the chief justice of the United States, put a song lyric where the citation to precedent usually goes. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:48 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
The seditious conspiracy statute was enacted during the Civil War and prohibits conspiracies to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 10:26 pm by Sean Hanover
Detained Alien last entered the United States on March 8th, 2003. [read post]
The suit asserts that the policy violates adult patrons' rights under the Washington State and United States Constitutions. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 1:45 pm by brian
The suit asserts that the policy violates adult patrons' rights under the Washington State and United States Constitutions. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:15 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Does the constitutional test for determining whether a section of a river is navigable for title purposes require a trial court to determine, based on evidence, whether the relevant stretch of the river was navigable at the time the State joined the Union as directed by United States v. [read post]