Search for: "V-lawyer"
Results 4681 - 4700
of 74,072
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2023, 8:03 am
BOYLES V. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 6:09 am
Circuit agreed with the DOL Administrative Review Board that Section 806 does not have extraterritorial application and the facts of the case did not give rise to a domestic application of SOX (Garvey v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 4:45 pm
: Abortion, Choice of Law, and a Modest Role for Congress (Forthcoming, 35 American Academy of Matrimonial Lawyers Journal (2023)) on SSRN. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 3:38 pm
Uncontested v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 2:17 pm
” Although Sternadel is no longer employed by a FINRA broker dealer, she is still subject to jurisdiction under Article V, Section 4 of FINRA’s Bylaws. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 1:47 pm
The plaintiffs’ lawyers are still filing merger objection lawsuits — they are just filing the lawsuits as individual actions rather than as class actions. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
(Basu v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:22 am
” Blum v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:01 am
But the defamation claims against DaBaby had been thrown out in September, in an opinion (Carey v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:01 pm
Mayes’ predecessor, Republican Mark Brnovich, was the lead petitioner in Brnovich v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 11:47 am
Nobles v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am
For those who stand to gain the most:POTENTIAL WINNERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Texas A&M (90 v. 46)Arizona (77 v. 45)George Mason (54 v. 30)BYU (43 v. 23)Arizona State (49 v. 30)Alabama (43 v. 25)Utah (54 v. 37)Maryland (64 v. 47)Boston University (28 v. 17)And who are likely to be adversely affected the most:POTENTIAL LOSERS, LAWYER/JUDGE CHANGE:Boston College (24 v. 37)Washington & Lee… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
In a context of extreme polarization, with ever-increasing distrust and dislike, parties tend to call lawyers rather than therapists. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:58 am
Our international dispute resolution lawyers are handling a case right now (so I cannot discuss it other than very broadly) that caused us to review a case, Phillips v Audio Active Ltd., 494 F.3d 378 (2d Cir. 2007), where the Second Circuit Court of Appeals (this is one level down from the US Supreme Court) held that a contractual provision stating that proceedings “are to be brought in England” meant England was an “obligatory venue,” in contrast to a… [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
In an environment where clients hire lawyers, not law firms, the rational response from law firms is to allocate their marginal dollars towards attracting and retaining the lawyers clients hire. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 2:54 pm
” Mistler v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 10:16 am
In terms of important case law, there is the forthcoming Supreme Court hearing of Rakusen v Jepson in January – the issue being whether a rent repayment order can be made against a superior landlord of the property or only the direct landlord. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 9:16 am
” The trolls’ lawyers sought to have an appeals court shut down the investigation. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 4:51 pm
ZXC v Bloomberg [2022] UKSC 5 This was the seminal privacy case of the year, decided by the UK Supreme Court. [read post]
