Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 33,852
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2006, 9:00 am
Kinkel v. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 8:39 am
Thanks to this SCOTUSblog post, you can find the opinion of the Court in California v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 9:11 am
Recently, the California Supreme Court held in Sullivan v. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 9:59 am
Last week, in Kilby v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
In Appelbaum v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
Taxpayers who paid into Los Angeles's illegally-imposed telephone user tax will get their refunds, after a ruling today from the California Supreme Court ruling in Ardon v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Stanford Law School Professor Ronald J. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Stanford Law School Professor Ronald J. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Stanford Law School Professor Ronald J. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Stanford Law School Professor Ronald J. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 3:02 pm
(See Navarrete v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 4:57 pm
No, not a 2/6 v. 2/5 smackdown, but rather PJ Gilbert's book review in yesterday's DJ of Justice Stanley Mosk, A Life at the Center of California Politics and Justice, by Jacqueline R. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 10:40 am
California’ Twitter... [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 1:40 pm
AEDPA deference is not applicable because the California Supreme Court's decision was contrary to established federal law. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:00 pm
Several Northern California Judges have recently ruled in prisoner and civil rights cases. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:04 pm
It'll make clear what the res judicata law is here in California. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 12:48 pm
(In case you're wondering what it's actually about, here's Justice Guerrero's helpful synopsis: "The California Sales and Use Tax Law (Rev. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm
Keating (1984) 465 U.S. 1, 10-11 [holding that the California Suprem [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 9:53 am
Worker’s Legal Recourse In California, wage and hour laws th [read post]