Search for: "DEFENDER SECURITY COMPANY" Results 4701 - 4720 of 17,956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2020, 12:18 pm by Erica D. Borghard, Shawn W. Lonergan
This would be as part of the terms of a company’s contract with the Defense Department. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:00 am by Jane Holl Lute and Bruce McConnell
Today’s environment does not, for example, adequately incentivize companies to write secure software. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Aaron Lancaster
Upon being notified by Kromtech, Walmart secured the bucket. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 8:00 am by Aaron Lancaster
Upon being notified by Kromtech, Walmart secured the bucket. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:00 am by Tim Sitzmann
Customs and Border Protection division of the Dept. of Homeland Security. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 2:53 pm by Kevin LaCroix
As I noted in a post last month (here), investors brought an AI washing-related securities lawsuit against the software platform company Innodata alleging that the company “misrepresented the extent to which the company’s products and services actually employ AI technology and also the extent of the company’s investment in AI. [read post]
4 May 2012, 10:45 am by William McGrath
In many cases, the defendant does not willingly pay may a forfeiture award and DOJ is forced to search for and secure assets, which would have made DOJ's job more difficult and taken longer than the years in Mr. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 1:53 pm
  The terms of the proposed settlement agreements prohibit the companies from misrepresenting their membership in any privacy, security or other compliance program. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 1:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Endorsement amended the policy to remove the limitation restricting the coverage for employees only to Claims for Securities Law Violations, extending the policy’s coverage afforded to employees even for claims that did not involve Securities Law Violations, but specifying further that this broader employee coverage is only available when the employees are co-defendants with officers and directors of the company. [read post]
25 May 2016, 3:46 pm by Lyle Roberts
  In a typical case, where the plaintiff alleges that a misrepresentation artificially inflated the company’s stock price, the defendant can satisfy this requirement by providing evidence that there was no stock price increase as a result of the misrepresentation. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The plaintiffs also alleged that the defendants wasted corporate assets and that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act in their 2014 and 2015 proxy filings. [read post]
18 May 2016, 11:19 am by Michael A. Gold
Old and flawed perceptions must give way to the reality that humans must be part of a company’s cyber security strategy. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 10:07 am by Carl Neff
The dispute in this case involves Defendant Optum’s acquisition by merger, via Defendant Audax Holdings, Inc. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:57 am by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint alleges that the defendants were aware of these problems because of calls to the company’s customer service line; because of academic research, which was communicated to the company; and because of product liability lawsuits that had been filed against the company. ? [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 8:50 am by Sam Antar
The judge said in his decision that Overstock would have to turn over the information the DAs want: Defendant shall produce the personal identifying information of those of its customers who complained to Defendant or questioned Defendant or made a statement to Defendant about any of the comparison prices for any of Defendant's products during the applicable time period. [read post]