Search for: "Doe Defendants 1 to 20" Results 4701 - 4720 of 8,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2015, 4:28 pm by Denis Stearns
Defendant closed its deli, and has warned consumers to discard any foods purchased from the deli after June 1, 2015. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This Court's prior decision further reviewed CPL §160.50(1) and CPL §160.50(3)(j). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:06 pm
Moreover, Colombia does not have a flexible fair use system like in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am by Patricia Salkin
California Building Industry Assn. v City of San Jose, S212072 (June 15, 2015) involved Plaintiff trade association’s challenge to Defendant City’s ordinance to require developments containing 20 or more units to make 15% of those units available for low or moderate income purchase. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:30 am by Michael B. Stack
He is an expert in employer communication systems and helps employers reduce their workers comp costs by 20% to 50%. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 8:15 pm by Patti Waller
Defendant closed its deli and warned consumers to discard any foods purchased from the deli after June 1, 2015. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:27 pm by Jon Sands
  This case was a hard-fought battle by Deputy Federal Public Defenders Gia Kim and Jonathan Aminoff of the Central District of California.]Mitchell v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm by Joseph Fishkin
I imagine there are people out there who would argue that various aspects of the life story of the victim or even the victim’s family might be relevant to (1). [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 10:28 am by Howard Knopf
It does not refer to any events since 2010 and doesn’t seem to include any longer any of the studies it has sponsored on its own in recent times, such as this one that I commented on in 2007. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:42 pm
It’s an interesting opinion, with a sharp dissent by Justice Samuel Alito, joined by the other conservatives, though it’s not clear how broad its impact will be. 1. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:02 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Trademark lawyers for Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. of California filed an intellectual property lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Hook's Apothecary, Inc. of Indiana, as well as unidentified Doe Defendants 1 through 20, infringed the following Imprimis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. trademarks: GO DROPLESS! [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 4:40 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The Court stressed that “[a]lthough parties may contractually agree to undertake a separate obligation, the breach of which does not arise until some future date, the repurchase obligation undertaken by [defendant] does not fit this description. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 10:00 am by Shea Denning
App. __, 760 S.E.2d 43 (July 1, 2014), and State v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 12:35 pm by Shea Denning
And G.S. 20-16.2 does not apply when blood is drawn pursuant to a search warrant. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 10:48 pm
    Judge Sigler began her legal career at the Miami-Dade County Public Defender's Office. [read post]