Search for: "Does 1-37"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 5,281
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
., 246 A.D.2d 246, 676 N.Y.S.2d 569, 37 U.C.C. [read post]
25 Jul 2009, 12:32 am
Slip op. at 37-38. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 12:17 pm
The Checklist, however, does much more than just identify various minor deficiencies that do not alone rise to non-compliance. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46) United Kingdom KCI foam dressing patent held valid, but does anyone know what happened? [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
Schapiro announced two changes to the enforcement process at the SEC intended to “empower” the staff of the Enforcement Division. [1] First, Chairman Schapiro ended a two-year “pilot” program, implemented by the prior Chairman, which required the Enforcement staff to seek prior approval of the Commission before negotiating a civil money penalty against a public company for alleged securities fraud. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
In its answer, Applicant conceded that it "does not sell in the US all of the apparel products listed in the application" for this mark. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:36 am
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against Defendants and DOES 1-20, and each of them, as follows: 1) For damages for failure to provide benefits under the Policy, plus interest, including prejudgment interest in a sum according to proof at the time of trial; 2) For compensatory damages in a sum according to proof at the time of trial; 3) For general damages in a sum according to proof at the time of trial; 4) For special damages in a sum according… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 7:58 am
10:44: OUTBURST #1! [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
” Satterfield, at 7336-37. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 4:52 am
N.J.S.A. 37:2-38. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 9:14 pm
July 1, 2009): Here, the Government argues that Detective Kreissler both consulted with a prosecutor and that a judge--who had previously found no probable cause in an affidavit and application submitted by Detective Kreissler--issued the warrant. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 11:01 pm
But what it does mean is that it is extremely unlikely that they will do so consistently. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:21 pm
Here’s what he said: I am not surprised that a lawyer would list "incorporate" as #1. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 2:23 pm
American Needle filed a complaint on 1 December 2004 alleging that this agreement violated Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:11 pm
As of July 1, 2009 Rule 37B has been amended adding a subrule which specifically states that “An offer to settle does not expire by reason that a counter offer is made. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 4:56 am
Unit No. 1, 278 F. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 10:18 am
Subsequent forgetfulness or negligence in possession does not negate otherwise-knowing possession of a controlled substance under Article 112a.Id., slip op. at 4.ACCA recommends a change to the Benchbook to reflect that statement of the law: "We specifically disapprove any implication to the contrary in Dept of the Army Pam. 27-9, Legal Services -- Military Judges' Benchbook, paragraph 3-37-1, note 3 and encourage the drafters to revise the note. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 5:58 am
The Amended Declaration does not come close to that threshold, and therefore he is excluded as an expert pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 37(c)(1). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 9:41 pm
Now let’s address Robert’s specific points: 1. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:25 pm
Jun. 1, 2009) In this case, the district court (Eastern District of Texas) found several claims of the patent at issue invalid under the definiteness requirement of 35 U.S.C. 112. [read post]
