Search for: "Goode v. State" Results 4701 - 4720 of 44,768
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2011, 3:59 am by INFORRM
   In England and any other common law jurisdiction (outside the United States), the damages would, at most have been in the low tens of thousands of pounds. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 7:00 pm by admin
Despite that good news, many states are still experiencing record unemployment; this rampant unemployment was the number one issue addressed by state legislatures this past year. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 3:36 am
” In April, the Supreme Court reviewed another 1st District decision, State v. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 9:55 am by Eric Goldman
This is another good example of why a federal anti-SLAPP law would do a lot of good, even in states that already have anti-SLAPP laws. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 10:14 am by Howard Bashman
Sixth Circuit reinstates Ohio State University’s Lanham Act and state law right-of-publicity claims against Redbubble: You can access today’s ruling of the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 9:06 am by Marcel Pemsel
Väderstad appealed to the General Court and limited its trade marks to the goods for which they had been found to be sufficiently represented but lacked distinctiveness. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am by centerforartlaw
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:12 am by centerforartlaw
For the decision, the Chamber stated the following: “…five mitigating circumstances, namely: (i) your admission of guilt; (ii) your cooperation with the Prosecution; (iii) the remorse and the empathy you expressed for the victims; (iv) your initial reluctance to commit the crime and the steps you took to limit the damage caused; and, (v) even if of limited importance, your good behavior in detention despite your family situation. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 3:30 pm by assoulineberlowe
Photo by Andrea Piacquadio on Pexels.comOn June 30, 2020, the United States Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Ginsburg in “United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 10:28 am
In a 3-2 decision, the Utah Supreme Court has held a liability waiver unenforceable, and permitted a skier to sue a resort for his injuries in a skiing accident, notwithstanding his agreement to the contrary by disingenuously expanding a state assumption-of-the-risk statute for ski resorts to forbid any contractual modification of liability. [read post]