Search for: "Human v. State"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 19,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2016, 8:36 am
Facts: This case (United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
The State responded to that argument with barely a paragraph of analysis, Brief for Appellee in Robinson v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 8:06 am
Case in point: Davis v. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 10:14 am
Club Madonna, Inc. v City of Miami Beach, 2022 WL 3022525 (11th Cir CA 8/1/2022) [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 10:14 am
Club Madonna, Inc. v City of Miami Beach, 2022 WL 3022525 (11th Cir CA 8/1/2022) [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 3:52 am
The key criterion for him is that the person must be acting on behalf of a State: [83]. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm
”[1] Which pretty succinctly states the main point of this entire series of blog posts: that human agency matters. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:49 pm
Under Mayo v. [read post]
28 May 2011, 5:39 am
The UK does, however, have a generally applicable statutory protection for freedom expression: section 12(4) of the Human Rights Act 1998. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 4:36 pm
Phelps, and United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2024, 11:13 am
Can detection by an automated system constitute the service provider becoming aware of it, or (as an English court in McGrath v Dawkins, a case concerning the eCommerce Directive hosting shield, appears to have held) only if a human being is aware? [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:45 am
Yesterday the SCOTUS handed down the long-awaited decision in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 6:00 am
" Citing Matter of Curtis v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 124 AD3d 1117, the court noted that upon investigating a complaint, SDHR may dismiss it without a hearing "if it concludes that no probable cause exists" and that "Courts give deference to SDHR due to its experience and expertise in evaluating allegations of discrimination, and will only disturb a determination of no probable cause if it is arbitrary [and] capricious or lacks a rational… [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 2:15 am
The USCO underlined again the importance of the “human authorship” requirement and stated that applicants must bear the duty to disclose the inclusion of AI-generated content in a work submitted for registration and to provide a brief explanation of the human author’s contribution to the work. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 6:17 am
State, supra (quoting Deal v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:15 am
In two recent decisions, the United States Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the Seventh Circuit each split with the Second Circuit’s 2010 decision in Kiobel v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 5:02 am
In Sciacca v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 7:15 am
Craig & Qasim discuss reaction, the legality of these orders, the executive branch v. [read post]
