Search for: "In The Matter Of: Jones"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 6,019
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2010, 12:21 pm
" Apart from the fact that most fiduciary definitions traditionally have been a matter of state law, the good professor addresses the issues raised by this unchartered territory. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
This time, BHP Billiton is using Cleary Gottlieb and, for Canada-specific matters, Blake, Cassels & Graydon. // On the defense side, Jones Day’s Bob Profusek (NY – M&A) and Phil Stamatakos (Chicago – M&A) have the lead, with support from Chris Hewitt (Cleveland – M&A), Ward Winslow (Chicago – Capital Markets), Andrew Farwig (Chicago – Capital Markets), Adam Schaeffer (Chicago – M&A), Mike Sennett (Chicago… [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 8:30 am
Unlike the insurer-defendant in Jones, however, Allstate did not contest that a covered peril (wind) caused some of the damage to some of the policyholder’s property; the question was which particular items of property were damaged by wind. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 7:19 am
"But that doesn't matter. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:43 pm
On Thursday, the court ruled.Oh, sure, a defendant has a right to an ex parte hearing on mitigation matters. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 4:20 pm
Consulting a lawyer experienced in handling these matters is usually easy. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 5:57 am
A British Columbia example is Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 7:29 pm
., dissenting).Issue(s): Petition for rehearing en banc.Held: “[T]he matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:25 am
Parties with unhappy supporters, naturally, tend to do poorly in elections, says Jeff Jones of Gallup, although more because voters switch allegiances than because they do not bother to vote at all. . . . [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am
Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 10:03 am
Probably they don't have to, since (i) breach of contract in an IP case isn't really an IP infringement but a contract matter and (ii) it's not clear if confidential information is IP for the purposes of the Directive.Lance-corporal Jones hereIncorporeal Jones hereJones the Cat hereWrotham Park here [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 8:54 am
Hauter, 14 Cal.3d at 110 (citing Jones v. [read post]
11 Aug 2010, 5:04 am
Ultimately, what expectations of privacy will count and won't count is a matter of "understandings that are recognized or permitted by society. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 8:13 am
The WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones summarizes Barnes’s article, while First One @ One First’s Mike Sacks explores “the possible political motivations and jurisprudential consequences” of the idea. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:38 am
I am pleased to present below an article submitted by John Iole, a partner in the Insurance Recovery Practice of the Jones Day law firm. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 11:49 am
He works with a number of law firms, including Fenwick & West, Cooley, Dewey & LeBoeuf, Jones Day and DLA Piper. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 12:47 pm
I don't know about you, but I find it's difficult to attend all the good panels going on at conferences such as SEALS, where there are simultaneous panels competing for one's attention, not to mention the temptations of the informal schmoozing, and yes, the surroundings. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 11:46 am
And I agree that as matter of policy, we might want a privacy statute to limit what the Fourth Amendment does not. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 9:27 am
In 2006, in Jones v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 10:12 am
The WSJ Law Blog’s Ashby Jones explores the potential next steps in the case, concluding that the law is “quite possibly” bound for the Supreme Court in the very near future, a sentiment echoed by John Schwartz of the New York Times and Ilya Shapiro at Cato @ Liberty. [read post]
