Search for: "In re: Justice v." Results 4701 - 4720 of 18,453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
In the Supreme Court term that ended last month, the Court decided United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:04 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:26 am by Steve Lubet
Supreme Court held that even the president’s assertion of confidentiality “must yield to the demonstrated, specific need for evidence in a pending criminal trial and the fundamental demands of due process of law in the fair administration of criminal justice” (U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 6:00 am by Quinta Jurecic
” And moving beyond the courts, oaths might even be beyond the capacity of other members of the legislature to judge: in Bond v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 6:24 pm by Peter Mahler
Rosania v Gluck As far as I know, the first case to raise that lurking question post-Raharney is Rosania v Gluck, 2019 NY Slip Op 32087(U) [Sup Ct NY County July 8, 2019], decided earlier this month by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Saliann Scarpulla. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
SOQUIJ is attached to the Québec Department of Justice and collects, analyzes, enriches, and disseminates legal information in Québec. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 12:33 am by John Collins
Justice Jagot’s reasons summarised the position as follows: “The implied licence arising on Seiko’s unrestricted sale of the printer cartridges did not extend to any of the modifications necessary to enable the cartridges to be re-used. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 2:49 am by Peter Mahler
Justice Borrok Re-Orders Receivership Justice Borrok’s brief analysis, and his decision to grant Tirakian’s request for a receiver, latched onto Tufenkian’s admission that he had continued to produce and market the LLC’s products under its brand name for an extended period post-dissolution. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
  We ask, because we’re jurying one of them. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Beware of your old expert reports, as Henry Carr J allows hearsay expert evidence in Illumina v Ariosa | Still want to be a UPC judge? [read post]