Search for: "Kat"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 6,549
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2019, 8:32 am
This Kat wonders, however, whether the interpretation adopted is a bit too strict…already having second thoughts when it comes to your next press release? [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 12:57 pm
Today, on her way back to England after attending an event on TDM in Brussels, this Kat could not help but wonder whether she should have bought that yummy-looking Belgian chocolate box what would happen tomorrow during the Final Plenary. [read post]
27 May 2014, 7:04 am
Alas, it was not to beMerpel was trying to spend her May bank holiday sunning herself on Mediterranean beaches, but she has been dragged back from her intended vacation by a flood of emails to the IPKat that have demanded her attention as International Kat of Mystery. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:10 am
This Kat thinks there is a case for saying that the good judge should fire the case back to Luxembourg and ask for some unequivocal clarification, though Merpel is inclined to think he should clarify the decision himself, leaving it for other judges to refer their cases to the CJEU if they disagree with him.Here's a not particularly rigorous survey (naturally, since it's not one of ours, adds Merpel), prompted by Merpel's recent post to the effect that French applicants… [read post]
12 Mar 2025, 9:02 am
A Kat awaiting weekly IP updatesDesignsKatfriend Henning Hartwig reviewed the interpretation of Articles 6 and 14 of Regulation 6/2002 (“CDR”). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 10:33 am
This Kat takes that to mean that as some similar-ish branding was permitted, there is a lower likelihood of confusion, although it is not clear. [read post]
19 Mar 2025, 1:41 pm
This Kat enjoyed some Spanish-grownEnvy® apples while writing this post.Photo by Jocelyn Bosse.The matter then escalated to the Supreme People’s Court, which upheld the ruling on 26 February 2025. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
The dissenting judgment of Mr Justice Fennelly argues this point and, in this Kat's opinion, has a good deal of force. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 12:31 am
The dissenting judgment of Mr Justice Fennelly argues this point and, in this Kat's opinion, has a good deal of force. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 2:45 am
The dissenting judgment of Mr Justice Fennelly argues this point and, in this Kat's opinion, has a good deal of force. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 4:18 pm
The Kats' Parliament: before you lobbythem, you have to catch them ... [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:18 pm
This Kat has not yet had the chance to read the judgment and suspects that either he or another Kat might revert to it. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
This Kat personally has a rather uneasy feeling about publishing historic Nazi content which can be spread further - potentially without any annotations or comments. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 7:14 am
This Kat agrees with Jeremy that there’s plenty of material for preliminary references to the Court of Justice of the European Union, as the various provisions in the Directive look, to say the least, open to various interpretations. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 12:28 am
The Kats' Parliament: before you lobbythem, you have to catch them ... [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
Edenborough expanded greatly on this case but this Kat was unable to quickly jot down all of his musings. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:56 am
(click here for Matt the Kat's post about Director Kappos's views on the matter)Harmonization of US patent law was exactly what spirited Rep. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 6:41 am
This Kat agrees with Jeremy that there’s plenty of material for preliminary references to the Court of Justice of the European Union, as the various provisions in the Directive look, to say the least, open to various interpretations. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:43 pm
Dame Hazel Genn DEB QC, Dean of UCL Faculty of Laws (and an inspiration to this Kat) first welcomed everybody, with Sir Robin Jacob (picture, right) seconding the welcome together with a brief statement of intent now that he finds himself truly "arrived at UCL". [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 3:53 am
So far as concerns the possibility of justifying that restriction in light of the objective of protecting intellectual property rights, the Court observes that the FAPL cannot claim copyright in the Premier League matches themselves, as those sporting events cannot be considered to be an author’s own intellectual creation and, therefore, to be ‘works’ for the purposes of copyright in the European Union [Not so fast, says the Kat: cannot specific "set pieces"… [read post]
