Search for: "Kat"
Results 4701 - 4720
of 6,612
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2012, 7:47 am
This Kat ventures the guess – and hopes - that this case will make it all the way to the BGH…. the questions raised are just too important. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 3:10 am
The Kats welcome Wolfe. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 1:22 am
32 years ago this Kat criticised this decision in "Authorising Copyright Infringements" [1980] Journal of Business Law 109 and he thought that its effect in Australia had been wiped out by legislative amendment, but now it has come back to haunt us. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
In his excitement this morning over the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Wintersteiger (see earlier post here), this Kat quite overlooked another significant ruling from the same court. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 4:33 am
I recently stumbled across a write-up in the Telegraph reporting that, in 2010, Mike Batt had admitted on Twitter that the whole thing had been a mischievous set-up intended to “stir debate about copyright issues” [one extremely red-faced Kat, who often reads the Telegraph, missed it: the write-up is here]. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 2:50 am
’Advocate General Advocate General Pedro Cruz Villalon advised the CJEU to answer all these questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered – and to the courts of the Member State where the means necessary… [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 12:08 pm
This Kat has many memories of John. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
Tennant, but not for life: Doctor Who has now used at least 11 actors In what may come as a surprise to some readers, fictional kats have fictional fancies and Merpel is obliged to confess that she is a die-hard fan of Dr Who. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 3:15 pm
This, as not even the oldest of Kats can personally remember is the year which saw Nicholas II ascend to the throne as the last Tsar of Russia, the African kingdom of Dahomey (now Benin) fell to the French, noted wit James Thurber was born, the short-lived Republic of Hawaii was formed and women in South Australia were given the right to vote. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 12:29 pm
Miserably failing to escape from her stereotype of the Kat team member who blogs on all the smutty stuff, Cat the Kat finds herself at the keyboard again, typing things which polite Kats would never even think of ... * "Patents and Jurisdiction I: Solving Solvay", here. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 9:24 am
Finally, the Kat's attention has been drawn to a title with which he was not familiar: Generic Bulletin ("the business newsletter for the generic medicines industry"). [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:52 am
Readers of this weblog will be happy to discover that they don't have to read the judgment from cover to cover to discover what's been happening: there follows an account by the venerable Matt the Kat who, having taken a break from blogging, has been coaxed into taking a brief break from his break in order to pen this blog post on a subject which is so dear to his heart. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:38 am
Kats and humans are now getting a little twitchy while they wait for a sighting of this case in the Curia diary here. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:52 pm
Kats Neil and Jeremy write for this blog. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 6:55 am
This Kat has not been able to get her paws on the particulars of claim but understands that the US One Direction also sought $1m in damages from Syco Music and Sony Music. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Hospira, and how the inventors were found to have intentionally decided not to submit two material pieces of prior art to the PTO. 5) IP Kat: Patents and jurisdiction 2: Innovia v Frito-Lay - This post analyzes the question of which court Europeans can bring their patent related claims. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
Hospira, and how the inventors were found to have intentionally decided not to submit two material pieces of prior art to the PTO. 5) IP Kat: Patents and jurisdiction 2: Innovia v Frito-Lay - This post analyzes the question of which court Europeans can bring their patent related claims. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
Email the IPKat's friend Thorsten Lauterbach at t.lauterbach@rgu.ac.uk -- and tell him the Kat sent you! [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
Inspired by the Kat's note (says the IPKat) or more probably to make good its deficiencies (says Merpel), none other than the internationally renowned scholar and practitioner Willem Hoyng (of Hoyng Monegier fame) has written the following comments: "As always I read with interest the IPKat, this time on my favourite subject: cross-border litigation. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 10:39 am
This Kat is once again in a bit of a panic. [read post]
